About the Author
Jo Clifton is the Politics Editor for the Austin Monitor.
Enter a search term below to search the Austin Monitor.
Tuesday, June 26, 2018 by Jo Clifton
Committee wants more responses from chief
The City Council Audit and Finance Committee accepted an audit from the Office of the City Auditor Monday that faulted the city’s processes in dealing with recommendations from the Citizen Review Panel to the chief of police. All the members of the committee present agreed that the public needs more information about the results of complaints lodged against police officers. (Mayor Pro Tem Kathie Tovo did not attend the meeting because of a conflicting appointment.)
In particular, Council Member Alison Alter and Mayor Steve Adler both said Brian Manley, newly sworn in as the city’s chief of police, should take another look at the idea of releasing a response to all the complaints sent to the chief by the review panel. During the time frame studied from Oct. 1, 2013, to Dec. 29, 2017, the panel wrote 28 memos concerning complaints against officers, the majority of which related to officer-involved shootings. However, the panel only received 10 written responses to those memos. Part of the problem auditors noted was that city policies prevented the Citizen Review Panel from communicating directly with the chief, “which may have affected the integrity of the oversight.”
The Austin Monitor reviewed the audit and detailed the auditor’s recommendations on June 22. Assistant Chief Chris McIlvain oversees the part of the department that includes the Internal Affairs Division. He told the committee members he would relay their request to the chief as well as to the Law Department, which was also instrumental in slowing down recommendations from the citizen panel to the chief, according to the audit. City management and the Police Department concurred with the recommendations made in the audit. However, in each case management noted that any implementation plan would be determined “should a labor contract with the Austin Police Association be approved by Council.”
Ken Casaday, president of the APA, told the Monitor, “We fixed all those problems mentioned (by auditors) in the contract the city decided to vote down” in December. “That’s why city management was happy with what they got in the labor contract.”
Casaday said under that rejected agreement the police monitor would have been able to send reports from the Citizen Review Panel directly to the chief, and the chief would have been required to respond. Casaday also said that he expects the change to be part of any new contract.
Photo by John Flynn.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.
Key Players & Topics In This Article
Austin City Council Audit and Finance Committee: a sub-group of the Austin City Council. It's members are charged with oversight of city fiscal operations and anything that falls under the purview of the Office of the City Auditor.
Austin Police Department: the law enforcement entity for the City of Austin.
Office of the City Auditor: This city department is created by the city's charter in order to establish and ensure "accountability transparency, and a culture of continuous improvement in city operations."