About the Author
Jo Clifton is the Politics Editor for the Austin Monitor.
Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- A plan to end night swimming at Barton Springs is over before it ever began
- Downtown report: Office vacancies up, infrastructure growth continues
- Former Council Member and dedicated environmentalist Jackie Goodman has died
- Council looks to change the ‘unhappy experience’ of DB90
- City to postpone UNO vote to consult with UT
-
Discover News By District
Popular Whispers
Sorry. No data so far.
Heavy lifting starts today on new land code
Tuesday, April 9, 2019 by Jo Clifton
At today’s work session, Council is scheduled to begin the process of answering the questions posed by City Manager Spencer Cronk concerning revisions to the city’s land development code. Cronk asked Council members to make clear whether they wanted a wholesale revision of the code or merely a rewrite of certain portions. From their postings on the City Council Message Board, it seems most Council members agree they want a complete rewrite. The other questions will prove more difficult as they relate to density, compatibility standards and parking requirements. Council Member Greg Casar and Mayor Pro Tem Delia Garza, as well as Mayor Steve Adler, have stressed the importance of moving forward with the goal of making major changes in 2019. Everyone agrees that the new rewrite “should ensure that the housing capacity for the city is significantly increased,” as Garza and Casar have stated. However, it is difficult to see how the city can achieve the goal of increasing the number of housing units by 135,000 in the next 10 years, even with a radical change to land use regulations. Council members Jimmy Flannigan, Pio Renteria, Ann Kitchen and Natasha Harper-Madison pose a number of questions and suggest their answers. For example, what should the city do about parking requirements? Their answer is: “One option could be to eliminate parking minimums city-wide and adopt parking maximums or minimum unit-yield in areas necessary to ensure sufficient transit-supportive development. Another option could be to eliminate parking minimums except in areas that require a more context-sensitive approach. Both options should be done with the understanding that parking supply will still be determined by both the market and federally mandated ADA-accessible parking and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) requirements.” Today’s conversation could be lengthy and will continue at Thursday’s Council meeting with the public invited to offer input.
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?