About the Author
Elizabeth Pagano is the editor of the Austin Monitor.
Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Austin unveils how light-rail could change the city in new report with detailed maps
- Lost Creek neighborhood sues city over tax efforts
- Density proponents encouraged by HOME six-month progress report
- Most Austin-area drivers will still need a vehicle inspection. Here’s where the rules have changed.
- On the verge of demolition, neighborhood seeks recognition for Holy Cross Hospital
-
Discover News By District
Popular Whispers
- The city is seeking applicants for the Community Development Commission to represent low-income residents
- DAA lunch talk looks at future of I-35 amid expansion, cap-and-stitch concerns
- Report: Austin home prices grew 85 percent since 2014
- Share your thoughts on CapMetro’s proposed upgrades for payment options
- City is preserving affordable housing near the Domain
Airport contract sparks larger questions
Monday, October 19, 2015 by Elizabeth Pagano
Discussion about construction contracts at the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport took a turn for the procedural at last Thursday’s meeting of City Council. Council Member Sheri Gallo explained that she had pulled the item for process questions, not because she didn’t support expansion of the airport or the contract with Hensel Phelps Construction Company, which is worth almost $300 million. Specifically, Gallo thought that discussion about the contract should take place in committee, not during regular Council meetings. Council Member Don Zimmerman agreed and proposed the contract be vetted at the Audit and Finance Committee. Mayor Pro Tem Kathie Tovo suggested that Council have “well-articulated policy questions” before sending things on to committee. And, she said, “I haven’t heard any today,” so she pushed to move forward with the contract and not place extra pressure on staff by cutting deadlines close. A motion to refer it to committee failed, and approval of the contract for a construction manager-at-risk ultimately passed unanimously. (A larger discussion — about the treatment of subcontracted employees on city contracts — has been promised in the future.)
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?