Austin orders sweeping probe of alleged racism, bigotry among police, including social media audit
The city of Austin will conduct a department-wide investigation of discrimination in the Austin Police Department, following accusations of racism and homophobia among the highest ranks.
“There comes a time in everybody’s existence to have to do something really hard because it’s worth it,” Council Member Natasha Harper-Madison said before Council voted on the measure Thursday night. “I think it’s time for the Austin Police Department to do something really hard because it’s worth it.”
In a unanimous vote following at least two hours of public testimony, Council members approved a far-reaching investigation, including an audit of police officers’ social media accounts, materials used in cadet training courses and the department’s recruitment efforts. Council has asked that the results of the investigation, plus recommended changes in the department, be made public by December 2021.
Separately, the city manager will revise training materials for new officers, with those changes to be made no later than June 2020.
The vote follows allegations made against two assistant police chiefs, one former, one current.
In October, the city’s Office of Police Oversight received an anonymous complaint claiming former Assistant Chief Justin Newsom had continuously used a racist term for black people, including when referring to a former City Council member and assistant chief. Newsom abruptly resigned Nov. 1, after 23 years with the department.
A second complaint alleged Assistant Chief Troy Gay had his child attend gay conversion therapy, a widely discredited practice aimed at trying to change a person’s sexual orientation.
“Racist language, slurs, intolerance, and derogatory behaviors are completely unacceptable in our community,” City Manager Spencer Cronk wrote at the time. “I am saddened to have received these anonymous allegations, and I intend to fully understand if there is any truth to them.”
Cronk hired a third party to investigate the allegations. The department-wide audit won’t begin until the results of this investigation are made public by the end of January.
An overwhelming majority of people who spoke in front of Council members Thursday were in favor of the audit. Several former police cadets testified about intimidation and discriminatory language they experienced in training classes in 2017.
“Instructors made derogatory statements about homeless people, telling us that if we did not already hate them we soon would. We were told that if someone resists arrest, they had earned a ‘legal ass-whooping,’” said Summer Spisak, who was part of a group of former cadets who wrote a letter to the city expressing concerns about new officer training, as reported by KVUE and the Austin American-Statesman.
“Those were just a few of the ways in which instructors prepared cadets to be the best police officers for this city,” she told Council members.
The city’s investigation into prejudice in the department’s training materials and practices could lead to the delay or cancellation of a scheduled June cadet class, one of three set to happen next year. Austin Police Association President Ken Casaday told Council members Thursday that could set APD back in its attempt to fill 170 current vacancies.
“To many of our members, this resolution feels like a slap in the face,” he said. “Cutting a cadet class eliminates another opportunity for men and women of diverse races, ethnicities and sexual orientation and those of lower economic resources from joining the Austin Police Department.”
But several Council members said it didn’t make sense to continue hiring new officers until training procedures had been evaluated.
Before voting for the investigation, Council Member Delia Garza said her faith in police leadership had been challenged.
“I was an early supporter of Chief (Brian) Manley,” she said, her voice shaking. “And I’ve been incredibly disappointed.”
Manley became Austin’s police chief last year, after serving more than a year in the interim role. He got the job after taking down a serial bomber, but some feared the decision was too rash.
Manley did not respond to a request for comment.
This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT. Photo by Jorge Sanhueza-Lyon/KUT.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.
Key Players & Topics In This Article
Austin City Council: The Austin City Council is the body with legislative purview over the City of Austin. It offers policy direction, while the office of the City Manager implements administrative actions based on those policies. Until 2012, the body contained seven members, including the city's Mayor, all elected at-large. In 2012, City of Austin residents voted to change that system and now 10 members of the Council are elected based on geographic districts. The Mayor continues to be elected at-large.
Austin Police Department: the law enforcement entity for the City of Austin.