About the Author
Chad Swiatecki is a 20-year journalist who relocated to Austin from his home state of Michigan in 2008. He most enjoys covering the intersection of arts, business and local/state politics. He has written for Rolling Stone, Spin, New York Daily News, Texas Monthly, Austin American-Statesman and many other regional and national outlets.
Enter a search term below to search the Austin Monitor.
City’s new historic preservation grants offer more eligibility, higher limits
Nearly a year after City Council directed staff to increase eligibility for sites in need of funding for preservation of historic structures, a new program will greatly increase funding to those properties.
The Heritage Grant Program opened its application process Monday, operating as part of the Economic Development Department to take over grant-making duties that had previously been handled through Visit Austin. The new effort comes with a $250,000 award maximum – more than four times the previous limit – and broader eligibility for what kinds of organizations and improvement projects can receive funding.
The program will be funded from 15 percent of the city’s annual Hotel Occupancy Tax revenues, with an exact budget expected to be decided by Council in October. Last year historic preservation efforts received $11.2 million total, with some of that money used for site acquisition expenses.
The changes to the property restoration efforts come after years of frustration from the preservation community that the city’s award limits and eligibility requirements barred for-profit businesses and only allowed improvements visible from a public right of way. Because of those parameters, there were multiple years when the city was unable to find enough eligible projects to use its entire allocation for preservation funding.
Alyson McGee, a board member of Preservation Austin and member of multiple city groups that helped rework the grant award process, said it wasn’t practical for many groups to try to fund needed projects with city funds.
“If you can only get $35,000, you might not be able to fully restore a building and so you have to break a project up into so many little pieces that it ends up costing significantly more,” she said. “And limiting it to only exterior work meant that things to make a place visitor-ready, like having a new HVAC system or restoring interiors, wasn’t getting done.”
Sites receiving funding will need to already have some kind of state or local historic designation, or receive one by the time the grant is awarded, to prevent for-profit businesses from using city funds to cover improvement costs that would boost the property’s resale prospects.
Another major requirement for grant selection is proximity to the Austin Convention Center, or a demonstrated contribution to the local tourism industry. Applications for the program are due by Aug. 16.
Melissa Alvarado, manager of the Heritage Tourism Division, said some sections of the city – including downtown and East Austin – already have high concentrations of historic properties that could benefit from the expanded program.
“Those clusters as we start to advance this process will start to evidence themselves,” she said. “My strategy will be to do email and social media and get out going door to door to introduce individuals in historic buildings to this program. … As long as they can evidence they are impacting the tourism and hotel and convention industry, I would encourage them to apply.”
In April, members of the city’s Tourism Commission floated an idea that historic preservation funding would be a way to provide economic assistance to music venues operating in the Sixth Street historic district.
McGee said the funds could create options for arts groups considering property moves in the near future.
“There are also a lot of places where tourists are visiting, like artist studios or small theaters, and those types of buildings can also benefit from that,” she said. “A theater group might decide to purchase a historic building because they know that there are public funds that can help them restore the building, rather than building new.”
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.
Key Players & Topics In This Article
Austin City Council: The Austin City Council is the body with legislative purview over the City of Austin. It offers policy direction, while the office of the City Manager implements administrative actions based on those policies. Until 2012, the body contained seven members, including the city's Mayor, all elected at-large. In 2012, City of Austin residents voted to change that system and now 10 members of the Council are elected based on geographic districts. The Mayor continues to be elected at-large.
historic preservation: Official actions of a municipality such as the City of Austin taken to preserve structures with their jurisdiction. Preservation is often accompanied by a property tax exemption.