Sections

About Us

 
Make a Donation
Fully-Local • Non-Partisan • Public-Service Journalism
 

Police and community groups join to explore how to improve oversight of APD

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 by Syeda Hasan

Austin’s system of police oversight may be more effective than others at promoting long-term change, but there’s still skepticism about the agency, according to a new report.

The report from the Office of the Police Monitor notes that agencies like Austin’s have the power to track whether a police department makes changes based on public feedback. The way the system is structured, however, has led to criticism by both the community and police. For example, the fact that the agency is run by full-time paid staff raises concerns of bias.

The report recommends further analysis and comparison of Austin’s system to that of six other cities.

“The civilian boards operate very differently” from each other, Police Monitor Farah Muscadin said when presenting the findings to City Council on Tuesday. “Some are just advisory in nature, that deal with just policy. Some have the ability to hire or fire the police chief. For example, that is the case in San Francisco.”

The findings show that while many other oversight agencies conduct independent investigations and allow people to file anonymous complaints, Austin’s Office of the Police Monitor does not. The report recommends that Austin look into comparable systems of police oversight in San Jose, San Francisco, Denver, Seattle, New Orleans and Minneapolis.

Muscadin said discussions with other jurisdictions will be open to the public.

“We’re going to be doing video conferencing with the various cities,” she said. “They’re all going to be held in City Hall. This proposed timeline includes coming back to you in October with those recommendations.”

A newly created working group will analyze potential policy changes before taking public input on how the system can be improved. The group plans to begin doing community outreach around the effort in September before presenting recommendations to City Council by October.

Some Council members, including Ellen Troxclair, said they’d like findings from the working group earlier to avoid prolonged negotiations with the police union over its labor contract. City Council rejected a new five-year contract in December.

“I’m hopeful that we will have a contract as soon as possible,” Troxclair said, “and I want to do what I can (on) the Council side to facilitate those successful negotiations.”

Rey Arellano, Austin’s assistant city manager, said the police union is one of the stakeholder groups identified to take part in these discussions, and the working group aims to make sure all these processes work together.

“We’re very mindful of the implications of everything that’s swirling around in terms of the negotiation and identifying what’s the best fit for us in terms of police oversight,” he said.

This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT. Photo by Gabriel Cristóver Pérez/KUT.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.

Join Your Friends and Neighbors

We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?

Back to Top