Enter a search term below to search the Austin Monitor.
Thursday, August 31, 2017 by Joseph Caterine
Harvey revives flooding concerns about CodeNEXT
In the wake of Hurricane Harvey, the land use commissions questioned staff on how CodeNEXT would address local flooding at their Aug. 29 joint meeting. “Austin came real close to having another catastrophe this (past) weekend. Real close,” Zoning and Platting Commissioner Ana Aguirre said at the meeting.
The storm event has opened up a national conversation on how city planning contributes to flooding, particularly in the case of impervious cover. As cities like Houston or Austin continue to develop, the inevitable result is more runoff after rainfall.
There are ways to mitigate it, though, and the CodeNEXT planners have high hopes for tools included in the new land use code. “CodeNEXT will do a much better job than what is currently on the books,” said Planning and Zoning Director Greg Guernsey.
In particular, the Watershed Protection Department has proposed a new regulation that would require redevelopment projects to retrofit the property with flood mitigation measures, like on-site detention ponds. Guernsey also mentioned that anyone can go to the city’s website to view flood plain maps.
Aguirre pointed out that what was missing from the data available on the city’s website was information on localized flooding, or flooding that specifically results from runoff or inadequate drainage systems as opposed to creek flooding when rivers overflow. “All of the properties (at risk of localized flooding) need to be identified. All of those properties should be included in the (CodeNEXT) mapping process,” she said.
Despite Guernsey’s reassurances that flood plain maps are being incorporated into the CodeNEXT maps, Planning Commissioner Karen McGraw said that if the risk of flood for a zoning district was not made explicit, especially if that district is upzoned through CodeNEXT, it might lead to future problems. “Why would we intentionally give away entitlements in a place that floods?” she asked.
Guernsey clarified that there are already regulations in place that prohibit new development in flood plain areas and also require Council approval for any additions to existing structures in those areas. McGraw disagreed and said that developers and homeowners are able to obtain waivers too easily. “I don’t think we want to make that a more prevalent situation,” she said.
The main obstacle faced by planners who want to use zoning to enforce flood mitigation is that flood plains change, Guernsey explained. Regional detention facilities may be constructed that remove properties from a flood plain, but if they were zoned as if they were in a flood plain then they would have to request a zoning change, a lengthy process.
Regardless, Zoning and Platting Commissioner Ann Denkler echoed her colleague’s calls for Watershed staff to present at a future joint meeting, because the CodeNEXT map could be integrating assumptions made by staff that the commissions and the public at large are being excluded from. She recalled investigating where a regional detention facility could be constructed to accommodate the Grove Planned Unit Development before it was approved, and she discovered that there weren’t any suitable sites for it along Shoal Creek.
“This isn’t just a matter of flood plains. It’s a matter of the mapping and how it relates to the stormwater infrastructure,” she said. “We’re not just buying out homes in Onion Creek. We didn’t just buy them out in Shoal Creek. (We) just spent $2 million on February Drive in District 1. That was an area annexed (into the city) with no curb and gutter.”
For context, about a quarter of the city’s storm pipes were constructed before 1977, before modern engineering standards had even been adopted.
Guernsey said that he would talk to Watershed staff and see when they could participate in a dialogue with the land use commissions.
Curious about how we got here? Check out the Austin Monitor’s CodeNEXT Timeline.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.
Key Players & Topics In This Article
City of Austin Planning Commission: This commission addresses issues of land use as assigned to it by Austin's City Code. These include the abilities "[t]o make and amend a master plan, recommend approval or disapproval of proposed zoning changes and control land subdivision within neighborhood planning areas and submit, annually, a list of recommended capital improvements." It has sovereign authority, or the right to make final decisions on certain cases.
City of Austin Zoning and Platting Commission: The City of Austin's Zoning and Platting Commission addresses issues of land use as assigned to it by Austin's City Code. It has sovereign authority, or the right to make final decisions on certain cases.
CodeNEXT: CodeNEXT is the name given to the land development code rewrite process undertaken in the early 2010s by the City of Austin.