Sections

About Us

 
Make a Donation
Fully-Local • Non-Partisan • Public-Service Journalism
 

Construction of new Central Library overdue, again

Tuesday, March 28, 2017 by Audrey McGlinchy, KUT

City Council members learned last week that the completion of the new downtown public library has been hit with delays, again.

“I do think that it is getting very close, but I don’t have a specific date that I can give you quite yet,” Toni Lambert, interim director of Libraries, told Council members at a budget meeting last week.

Some city leaders were not pleased.

“It’s a Groundhog Day,” said Council Member Ora Houston. “I’ve only been on the Council two years and some months, and that’s the response I get every time, is that it’s soon, it’s soon.”

The original grand opening of the library was set for November 2016. Now, city staff has no clear date. Once construction, which began in 2013, is complete, public library staff will need five to six more months to prep it for the public, a process that will include installing shelves and furniture. The library could open as early as this fall.

“I don’t know exactly when that date will fall,” said Lambert.

In 2006, Austin voters approved $90 million in bond money to construct a new Central Library. But years later, a “revisioning” of the project made it clear that more money would be needed – so in 2010, Council approved an additional $30 million. Last year, Council signed off on another $5 million, bringing the total project cost to $125 million.

City staff has said the increased price tag is not because staff underestimated costs, but because the project design changed since voters approved the bond money a decade ago.

“It wasn’t a cost overrun; it was a change in scope,” said Mayor Steve Adler. But he told staff they needed to be more specific with the public about what has caused the delays and additional costs. “If we could have a definitive statement to that, that really does explain that, I think that would be really helpful.”

Council Member Jimmy Flannigan said the experience has strained the public’s trust.

“We cannot repeat this,” said Flannigan. “If we can’t clearly and definitively answer how a $90 million project turned into $125 million project, how can I go back to the community to build the next thing?”

This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT. Photo by Gabriel Cristóver Pérez/KUT News.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.

Join Your Friends and Neighbors

We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?

Back to Top