Sections

About Us

 
Make a Donation
Fully-Local • Non-Partisan • Public-Service Journalism
 

Council votes down attempt to revisit McMansion exemption

Tuesday, October 11, 2016 by Cate Malek

An amendment that some hoped would lead to more clarity in the McMansion Ordinance only seemed to lead to greater confusion at a City Council meeting on Oct. 6.

The McMansion Ordinance was passed in order to prevent developers from building oversized houses on small lots. But the complicated ordinance has led to some confusion, especially over which exemptions to the ordinance homeowners are able to claim.

At its last meeting, Council voted on an amendment that would have changed part of the ordinance that eliminated exemptions for carports when they are enclosed and turned into garages. The current language in the ordinance was causing confusion for homeowners who bought houses with unfinished garages, unaware that if they put a door on those garages their house would be out of compliance with city code.

Although city staff supported the amendment, Council failed to pass it in a tight vote of 5-5 with Mayor Steve Adler and Council members Greg Casar, Sheri Gallo, Delia Garza and Pio Renteria opposed and Ellen Troxclair absent.

Adler explained that he was voting against the amendment because the McMansion Ordinance was a hard-fought compromise and he was afraid of opening the ordinance up to more changes.

“I think there was a group that got together, and they made a compromise. I’m going to abide by that compromise,” he said.

Other Council members were concerned that trying to fix the carport exemption could cause even more unintended consequences for homeowners who had carports that they had no intention of turning into garages. Later in the meeting, Council members realized that city staff had proposed an amendment that could have addressed some of those concerns, but an attempt to reconsider the issue failed.

Those who supported the amendment said they were simply trying to get rid of a confusing exemption that could be used as a loophole for developers trying to increase the size of the property they could build on a lot.

“The exemptions are, in my personal opinion, one of the more complicated areas of the McMansion Ordinance,” said Development Services Manager John McDonald.

Photo by TerriersFan at en.wikipedia, CC BY 2.5,

Do you like this story?

There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by donating to the nonprofit that funds the Monitor.

Back to Top