Enter a search term below to search the Austin Monitor.
Tuesday, May 17, 2016 by Audrey McGlinchy
Updated: Task force report on Austin flooding prioritizes ‘life, safety and property’
Update: After our story was originally published, we heard from several members of Flood Mitigation Task Force, who disputed the assertions made by some task force members, including the group’s chairman, who said the final report lacked prioritization.
An executive summary of the report, not available at Monday’s meeting of the Council’s Public Utilities committee, whittles down the nearly 200 recommendations into 19 high priority ones. Topping that list is the creation of a city-wide policy that prioritizes life, safety and property when it comes to flooding. The task force recommends that the city then consider this when making upcoming budget decisions.
In conversations with other members of the task force, some took issue with chairman Matt Reinstra’s presentation of the report to the Public Utilities Committee. At that time, he did not present the executive summary to council members because it had not yet been finalized by the task force.
“Many of the things he mentioned as recommendations were very minor things that were in there,” said task force member Ken Jacob. “We’re trying to come forward and say this is important. This is something you, the council, needs to pay attention to and the city needs to pay attention to because it’s a big issue.”
Jacob also cautioned against considering too heavily the report’s note that, at the city’s current rate of improvements, it would cost $2 to $4 billion to address local flooding issues.
“The numbers are just estimates [staff] were able to pull out there,” said Jacob. “And they’re going to have to do more work on that to finalize it.”
Original Story: At 89 pages, flood mitigation task force report ‘missed its mark’
Nearly a year after floodwaters wrecked businesses and homes in Austin over Memorial Day weekend, members of the Public Utilities Committee heard a rundown of a report from the city’s flood mitigation task force.
The report is an 89-page document bursting with nearly 200 recommendations for city staff — among them, suggestions to replace aging storm drainage systems and enhance public outreach efforts from the city’s Watershed Protection Department. According to the report, the total cost of these recommendations ranges from $2 billion to $4 billion.
City Council Member Leslie Pool, who sat in on the Monday meeting, congratulated the group’s 22 members.
“I never in my wildest dreams thought you would have nearly 200 recommendations,” she said. “That really speaks to the level of diligence and concern that everybody brought.”
But others, like task force member Robert Henneke, had a different take.
“The process has missed its mark,” he said. “The end result is a voluminous, cumbersome compilation of 160- to 200-some recommendations. Anything that anyone wanted to say was just lumped into this big, voluminous document.”
Henneke said that while members worked hard, the objectives approved by Council in a resolution back in June were too broad and the group was given too little time to complete its report.
The result, Henneke said, is a rambling list of recommendations with no prioritization.
Task force chairman Matt Rienstra agreed.
“We probably need a lot more time to really drill down on this, have the debate amongst ourselves as to what we should ultimately come down (on) as policy recommendations, with some possible tactical recommendations from those policies,” he said.
But when it comes to flooding in Austin, many will say that too much time has already been taken. At a Council meeting in November — specially called because of flooding in Dove Springs just days before — residents told stories of being stranded in flood-prone areas while the city worked to buy flooded homes from owners.
At the sign of a couple of inches of rain, Dove Springs resident Yvette Griego said that she prepares herself for the worst.
“I pack my dogs,” she told Council members in November. “I have a box with all my important papers, and I have my clothes. And I leave like that, and I live like that. I’ve lived like that for two years.”
Several of the report’s recommendations include speeding up the city’s flood buyout program.
Council Member Ann Kitchen announced Monday that she will give her colleagues a chance to address this on Thursday, with a resolution asking the city manager to find $5 million to buy homes in the city’s Upper Onion Creek area. As of May 2, the city has yet to begin the process of purchasing roughly 150 homes in the Onion Creek area.
This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT.
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.
Key Players & Topics In This Article
Austin City Council Public Utility Committee: A City Council committee that reviews issues related to water and drainage utilities.
Watershed Protection Department: The city's Watershed Protection Department works to reduce the impact of floods, erosion and water pollution in the city. The department is mostly funded by the city's drainage fee.