About the Author
Mike Kanin is the Publisher of the Austin Monitor. As such, he doesn't report on much--aside from the workings of the Monitor--any more. In his previous life as a freelance journalist, Kanin has written for the Washington City Paper, the Washington Post's Express, the Boston Herald, Boston's Weekly Dig, the Austin Chronicle, and the Texas Observer.
Enter a search term below to search the Austin Monitor.
New Watershed Protection Ordinance up for Council consideration
Austin City Council members may offer only limited approval to a series of dramatic changes to the city’s Watershed Protection Ordinance. The rewrite, a document that exchanges small allowances of additional impervious cover for more protection of the city’s creek watersheds – among other items – is set for a vote and public hearing on Thursday.
It could be approved on all three readings, or Council members could – as they hinted at a work session Tuesday – opt for a slower approach. Some language in the revisions applies to the city’s Save Our Springs Ordinance, and will thus require six votes for passage.
Some in the environmental community are concerned that city officials may only be dragging their feet to allow for additional grandfathering of properties that might otherwise be affected by the rules. Grandfathering – and how much the city can afford to allow until it faces some sort of legal or legislative backlash – continues to be a significant issue for
Matt Hollon, Environmental Division Manager at Austin Watershed Protection, told In Fact Daily that neither he nor his department were dragging their feet. “Obviously, that’s not what we want to do,” said Hollon. “This has been a long process…we have been really careful in this thing to get it right and be responsive (to stakeholder) input.”
Hollon also suggested that the department was still engaged with stakeholders, and that the possibility remains that the ordinance could be ready for full approval Thursday. He added that a Council delay would not make a huge difference for staff.
That opinion echoed what Hollon’s colleague Jean Drew told Council members Tuesday. Drew cited the rule-making that would follow Council approval of the ordinance. “It really won’t have much of an impact because the rules are done in quarterly cycles,” she said. “It takes probably a minimum of three months to go through the rules-posting process and that’s really assuming we have no stakeholder input.”
The resolution calls for changes in a broad watershed protection rules first set by Council members in 1986. The update features an extension of the “critical water quality protection zone buffer to streams with 64 acres of drainage citywide,” according to a takings assessment prepared for the State of
Council Member Kathie Tovo offered Hollon some cover for a quicker approvals process. “It sounds to me like your timeline is…most benefitted by us considering and passing this on all three readings on Thursday,” she said. “If we passed it on first reading, it delays the rules process to an extent that makes it challenging.”
Hollon affirmed her take on the matter, later noting that a minor delay would not have too much in the way of a negative impact, but that a pause of a month or more could be problematic.
Council Member Bill Spelman offered his read. “If we postpone for a couple weeks, even a month, it wouldn’t have any effect because you are going to have to post (the rules process) within two months,” he said. “But there are some people that are suggesting that we not take this up on third reading until the rules have been promulgated. That won’t work for you because you need the ordinance before you can post the rules.”
Drew confirmed that that was the case – and that the delayed third reading scenario might allow a set of emergency rules set in place as part of the ordinance process to expire. That eventuality could allow for a more rough transition to the new watershed protection rules.
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.
Key Players & Topics In This Article
Austin City Council: The Austin City Council is the body with legislative purview over the City of Austin. It offers policy direction, while the office of the City Manager implements administrative actions based on those policies. Until 2012, the body contained seven members, including the city's Mayor, all elected at-large. In 2012, City of Austin residents voted to change that system and now 10 members of the Council are elected based on geographic districts. The Mayor continues to be elected at-large.
Save Our Springs Ordinance: A 1992 ordinance to restrict development in the Barton Creek watershed.
Watershed Protection Ordinance: The city law, overhauled in 2013, that dictates Austin’s water and environmental code.