About the Author
Mike Kanin is the Publisher of the Austin Monitor. As such, he doesn't report on much--aside from the workings of the Monitor--any more. In his previous life as a freelance journalist, Kanin has written for the Washington City Paper, the Washington Post's Express, the Boston Herald, Boston's Weekly Dig, the Austin Chronicle, and the Texas Observer.
Most Popular Stories
Discover News By District
New life for disqualified MRF bidders?
Texas Disposal Systems’ (TDS) roundabout bid to take part in the City of
“I know and staff knows that Mayor (Lee Leffingwell) and Council want to see the TDS proposal,” Solid Waste Advisory Commission (SWAC) Vice Chair Rick Cofer told In Fact Daily.
The latest chapter in what has become a months-long saga comes as the request for proposal (RFP) process associated with the project winds toward a date with the City Council.
In an interview with In Fact Daily, Solid Waste Services (SWS) Director Bob Gedert confirmed that he wasn’t quite ready to rule TDS out. Still, he said, any change to the status of the Buda-based waste firm’s bid would have to come from on high.
“(I’m) leaving the door open and awaiting a policy decision from City Council,” he said.
As it stands, staff is currently vetting the eight unnamed bidders involved in the process. If nothing changes, they expect to bring a shortlist of candidates to the Council by sometime in May or June.
Faced with a potential disqualification from the MRF request for proposal (RFP) process based on Austin’s anti-lobbying ordinance, TDS decided to couch its MRF ideas in the form of an amendment to its existing contract with the city (see In Fact Daily, Feb. 10, 2010). City Attorney David Smith then ruled that the proposal didn’t conform to city standards and that neither staff nor the Council could consider it (see In Fact Daily, Feb. 24. 2010).
Among a broad list of ideas about the future of
The Council does have options if it would like to reinstate the TDS bid. It could ignore or disagree with Smith’s ruling and instruct staff to include the proposal in its assessments. Alternately, it could restart the MRF RFP process, leaving out the anti-lobbying provision that might have led to TDS’ disqualification. However, sources say that either of those actions could bring on a lawsuit from the current MRF respondents.
Gedert told In Fact Daily that
“When you’re pursuing 90 percent (waste diversion), you have to be looking collectively at all of the waste streams,” he noted. Indeed, in a briefing that he delivered to the Emerging Technology and Communications Committee (see In Fact Daily, April 20, 2010), Gedert told Council members Laura Morrison and Chris Riley that it could take as many as four MRFs to handle the weight of
This statement would seem to leave the door open for TDS in another way. For his part, Gedert said that he thinks of the company as a “partner,” adding that he expects the city and the firm to have “a fruitful working relationship in the future.”
Gedert aims to have these and other comprehensive details about the workings for his zero waste drive worked into a master plan. If all goes smoothly, that document would be ready for Council approval in 12 months.
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?