Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Council approves grant award to replace Barton Springs Road Bridge
- Austin Independent School district buys more time for plan to address Dobie Middle School, but prepares for seismic shifts
- New Austin program helps connect residents with jobs as city begins major construction projects
- Homelessness strategy plan calls for $101M in spending from city, partner groups
- Developer appeals denial of right-of-way vacation
-
Discover News By District
Quarries question aquifer district’s authority to prohibit water use
Monday, November 23, 2009 by Laurel Chesky
In September, the Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer Conservation District passed a set of new regulations designed to protect the aquifer during times of drought. Those rules aren’t sitting well with at least one of the district’s constituents, who has indicated that legal action might be in order if the district enforces the rules.
The rules tightened water-use restrictions during drought, calling for a tiered schedule of curtailment during various phases of drought severity. During the most extreme drought conditions, the rules call for a 100 percent ban on water use except for health and safety purposes.
That means that in extreme drought, two industrial permittees in Buda, CenTex Materials and Texas Lehigh Cement Company, would have to shut down their operations. The companies use well water from the Edwards Aquifer to wash rock mined from their quarries and produce cement.
Nevertheless, the board passed the rules, and permittees were notified that they were required to update their User Drought Contingency Plans to comply with the new rules. But late last month, CenTex made it clear that it’s not in a hurry to acquiesce.
“… Centex will be uniquely and significantly impacted by the drought restrictions in the adopted rules,” Loftis wrote in an Oct. 30 letter to the aquifer district. “CenTex is currently evaluating its options and the impact of the rulemaking on its operations and at this time we will not be submitting an amended UDCP by the October 31, 2009 deadline.”
Apparently, one of the options CenTex was considering is legal action against the aquifer district. At the Nov. 19 district board of directors meeting, district General Manager Kirk Holland said that in a subsequent communication, a CentTex representative indicated that the aquifer district “went beyond its authority” in the rulemaking and that the curtailment rules “constitutes a taking.” An unjust “taking” is the legal term for the government condemning property without fairly compensating the owner.
Complicating the matter is the fact that the board cannot easily change the rules. Amending them requires an extended public education and comment period.
The board went into closed session to discuss the matter with the district’s attorney, Bill Dugat. Afterwards, in open session, the board voted to suspend the requirement for submitting an UDCP to comply with the new rule until August 2010. The board also directed
CenTex and Lehigh are currently in discussions with the city of
Aquifer board members have indicated their initial support for the project in order to conserve the nearly three million gallons of aquifer water the two companies collectively use each year.
At last week’s meeting, Board Member Mary Stone reiterated her strong support for the effluent project, saying that she’d prefer aquifer water not be used to “wash rock.”
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?