Most Popular Stories
Discover News By District
Commissioners disagree on future of historic home
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 by Kimberly Reeves
The Historic Landmark Commission failed to pick up a majority on a case to rezone a historic property on
The home at
Historic Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky tended to lean toward the owner’s viewpoint. As Sadowsky described in his supporting documentation, the trend to turn historic houses into small quaint offices and businesses – on
Local homeowners preferred to see the house maintained as a single-family residence. Walt Hornaday of the Judges Hill Neighborhood Association noted the large “for lease” signs that often went up on historic properties, and he showed photographs of homeless people sleeping on the stoops of area homes that were turned into business offices. Too often a historic LO zoning has meant additions to the back or requirements for additional business parking, he noted.
The Judges Hill neighborhood gathered 54 signatures to oppose the re-zoning. Bennett noted that the signatures did not constitute a valid petition, given the distance of the property owners from the
Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Director Greg Guernsey, who happened to be on hand to discuss his department’s budget, did note that new LO zoning would require a variance if the owner intended to maximize the allowances for parking. Bennett, on the other hand, noted that any parking variance would have to come before the Historic Landmark Commission, where commissioners could decide it was inappropriate.
The property also backs up to a parking lot of a local church. Bennett speculated it would be easy to rent parking spaces at the church on weekdays.
The Historic Landmark Commission was split on this one, and with Chair Laurie Limbacher and Commissioner Daniel Leary absent, it was impossible to get a four-vote majority necessary to pass the motion for – or against – the base zoning change.
Commissioners Joe Arriaga and John Rosato, both former city employees, leaned toward the pragmatic approach to the house. If the historic fabric and integrity could be maintained, then it was logical to allow the property, less than a block off the busy
Commissioner Terrie Meyers, a historic preservationist, was more inclined to maintain the current single-family status.
“I have a lot of sympathy for the people who do live in the area,” Meyers said. “And if you mention that 50 percent is residential and 50 percent LO, we are at the tipping point, and maybe we do have the chance to retain the residential use in this area.”
If the commission were to approve LO zoning, it would only mean the likely return of a new owner on the property, one that could demand – and probably get – a parking variance because the land already would be zoned LO-MU-H, said Meyers.
On two votes – one in favor and one against LO zoning – the commission was split 3-2, with Timothy Cuppett, Patti Hansen and Meyers voting in favor of retaining single-family zoning and Arriaga and Rosato voting for office zoning. Without a 4-vote majority, the decision will be forwarded to the Planning Commission without a recommendation.
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?