Newsletter Signup
Most Popular Stories
- City to ban unsafe fence designs
- Former city employee abused sick leave policy, audit says
- On-street light rail route selected as best option for city’s mass transit plan
- Judge will see secret personnel file of Austin police officer charged with murder in Mike Ramos shooting death
- Austin is opening a temporary homeless shelter in Southeast Austin
-
Discover News By District
Commission vote brings Marriott construction closer
Tuesday, September 2, 2008 by Austin Monitor
Developers of a planned $185 million Marriott Hotel complex moved a step closer to tearing down the small buildings currently housing the Las Manitas Café and two relocated businesses last week as the Historic Landmark Commission rejected a motion to begin historic zoning cases on the properties.
Prior occupants Tesoros Trading Company and Escuelita del Alma Child Care Center have left
Commissioner Patti Hansen, among others, was not pleased that many of the questions she posed about the historic integrity of the building and its history remained unanswered. Historic Preservation Officer Steve Sadowsky, who was in charge of the case, was absent from Monday night’s meeting. Colleague Susan Villarreal presented the case in Sadowsky’s absence.
Sadowsky had recommended the demolition permits on the 200 block of
During much of its early history, the three-story
Cynthia Perez of Las Manitas was on hand to argue against the demolition. Perez noted she was alone because many of those who fought for Las Manitas and Escuelita del Alma had given up hope. She talked about the goal to create a space that would provide a bridge for new and old city leaders.
“My fight is not with my landlord,” Perez said. “My fight is with my city, and the direction it was growing and the benefit it was doing for the larger corporation.”
Hansen said Villarreal’s recitation of the facts in Sadowsky’s report still did not answer the issues she wanted to address: What in the current building was architecturally new and architecturally old? What is left of the original materials in the façade in the building?
Sadowsky recommended approving the demolition permits, with the proper
Attorney Michael Whellan, who represented the developer, argued that various parts of the building had been constructed and reconstructed over the years. He noted a portion of wall on the former Tesoros that might have indicated the end cap was bricked over more recently.
In his rebuttal, Whellan noted that Las Manitas – and its purpose as a bridge – was not lost. It was simply moving up the block to property owned by Perez.
Sadowsky’s report noted that the Pearl House on the corner, currently serving as the La Pena Art Gallery, was the only building to maintain its historic integrity. But that storefront looked the same as its neighbors, Hansen said. Even if the current balance of the structure was not the first version of the building, wouldn’t the existing framework still be historical? Hansen asked.
Terri Myers, the newest member on the Historic Landmark Commission, agreed with her. Whether the
“They have not lost their historic character,” Meyers said. “And they were noted in the 1984 (city historic structure) survey as a Priority II. They exhibit, intact, the qualities of that period. We should spend a little more time researching this.”
Chair Laurie Limbacher recused herself from the
Myers moved for initiation of historic zoning. Hansen and Commissioner Dan Leary joined her, with Commissioners John Rosato and Timothy Cuppett and Joe Arriaga voting no. After the 3-3 vote, which resolved nothing, Leary asked for the vote to be reconsidered. He then changed his vote from yes to no, making it 4-2 against.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?