Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Austin opens new affordable housing development in Southeast Austin
- Landmark commission says goodbye to Nau’s Enfield Drug
- Ryan Alter and colleagues propose revision of boards and commissions
- ZAP Commission forwards recommendation allowing some commercial uses in residential zones
- After a decline last year, Travis County homeowners should expect a return to rising property taxes
-
Discover News By District
Citing Proposition 2, Council approves funds for bond validation suit
Friday, September 26, 2008 by Austin Monitor
The Austin City Council has approved a resolution to hire outside legal help to mitigate the unintended consequences the proposed Stop Domain Subsidies charter amendment might have on the
After a lengthy closed session, Council members voted 7-0 to hire the law firm of Vinson & Elkins for $75,000 to help the city file a bond validation lawsuit. The purpose of the suit would be to ensure that the city could pay off bond debts related to the Mueller redevelopment. That suit would not be heard until after the election.
“There are a number of areas involving Catellus Development and the Mueller redevelopment where the city is providing financial incentives,” said City Attorney David Smith. “The city has issued bonds for parts of the project, and we fully expect to be able to pay them back.”
Smith said that filing a bond validation lawsuit would keep the potential effects of Proposition 2 from impairing confidence in the bond markets that the city would be able to repay its bond obligations.
“I was on the dais back in 1999 when we began the process of redeveloping the
In a statement issued Thursday, Catellus Development said. “After careful review of this amendment by legal counsel, it is clear to us that if it passes, it will have a negative impact on Mueller. We also feel that this charter amendment will make it harder, not easier, for the community, the city and developers to achieve the Mueller model of responsible, successful development.”
Meanwhile, members of the Stop Domain Subsidies group held a media event Thursday to protest the Council’s move and promote Proposition 2 on the Nov. 4 ballot. They even brought along a live pig to make their point.
“‘Charity’ the hog came from a local petting zoo,” said Stop Domain Subsidies leader Brian Rodgers. “Charity is here to represent the developers that feed at the public trough here at City Hall. Proposition 2 will stop that sort of public feeding by the hog developers.”
The Stop Domain Subsidies amendment seeks to stop the city from subsidizing retail-oriented developments, like The Domain in
The city is scheduled to pay
Rodgers said Council Member Randi Shade has been very helpful in trying to determine whether Simon Malls has provided the documentation to the city needed to determine whether Simon has lived up to its part of the agreement in terms of job creation and other issues. He said Shade has gotten an item on the Oct. 2 public Council agenda. “Thanks to Randi in her continuing press for open government,” he said. “That’s how democracy should work.“
Shade said prior to the decision to place the item on next week’s agenda, the item had only been scheduled for a presentation at the Council’s Audit and Finance Committee—on Oct. 28, not giving the Council a chance to consider whether the information is adequate. She noted that the Council had hired an outside auditor to report to the Council in addition to city staff. If they are dissatisfied, she said, the Council could direct the city manager not to make the payment. Shade opposes the charter amendment.
“As the public grows more and more educated, our forces grow stronger. I think it’s hard for them (pro payment folks) to frame the issue too,” he said. “Some people say keep
Others spoke out against Prop 2 at Thursday hearing. East Austin Activist Paul Saldaña said he had major concerns about it.
“I think there are unintended consequences,” he said. “As a business owner, and as an advocate for businesses here in town, I’m concerned about some of the unintended consequences. You may have heard some concerns about potential impact on the Mueller redevelopment. I’m just concerned about the millions and millions of dollars in litigation that could potentially hurt
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?