About the Author
Jo Clifton is the Politics Editor for the Austin Monitor.
Most Popular Stories
- City to ban unsafe fence designs
- Former city employee abused sick leave policy, audit says
- On-street light rail route selected as best option for city’s mass transit plan
- Judge will see secret personnel file of Austin police officer charged with murder in Mike Ramos shooting death
- Austin is opening a temporary homeless shelter in Southeast Austin
Discover News By District
Railroad Commission rejects Robbins’ complaint
Tuesday, May 7, 2019 by Jo Clifton
The Texas Railroad Commission, which hears appeals of certain gas utility rates, has dismissed an appeal from the city of Austin’s decision related to Texas Gas Service’s conservation adjustment fees. Utility customers pay those fees along with charges for natural gas service to defray the cost of the company’s conservation programs. Consumer and energy conservation advocate Paul Robbins complained to Council last year about Texas Gas Service’s conservation programs, basically saying they cost too much and save little energy. But Council approved the rates and Robbins filed an appeal with the commission. Subsequently, Administrative Law Judge John B. Dodson ruled that the city “has exclusive jurisdiction over the gas utility rates and related programs within its boundaries.” Therefore, the commission has no authority to hear the case. Robbins was not particularly surprised to lose, but he was surprised and quietly outraged when he learned that the city sought to assess litigation expenses it had incurred during the proceeding. In ruling against the city’s request for an unspecified amount of fees, the judge said, “Mr. Robbins describes himself as an activist, but he also is an Austin resident and TGS customer, and his grievances raised in this docket appear to be good-faith attempts to bring legally remediable claims. This ruling granting dismissal is not a determination that his grievances are without merit, but rather that the Railroad Commission is without jurisdiction to hear them.” Robbins told the Austin Monitor that he filed a public information request to find out how much the city spent on the litigation. He did not receive that information, he said, only the hourly salaries of people who worked on the case. Anyone who knows Robbins will not be surprised to learn that he has not given up on this particular quest.
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?