About the Author
Jo Clifton is the Politics Editor for the Austin Monitor.
Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- New federal cash paves way for East Austin’s ‘wishbone’ bridge over Lady Bird Lake
- Austin’s airport is getting a new concourse and 20 more gates but not until the 2030s
- Judge rules city can’t use taxpayer money for South Central TIRZ
- Save Our Springs Alliance sues City Council over Open Meetings Act
- Democrats vs. Republicans: First election coming for Travis Central Appraisal District board
-
Discover News By District
Bar poll receives some odd responses
Friday, February 24, 2017 by Jo Clifton
The Austin Bar Association has released the results of its latest online poll evaluating the performance of local judges. According to the poll, 373 men and 239 women participated, along with 61 individuals who did not wish to reveal their gender. Of those 673 people, nearly 73 percent designated themselves as Caucasian while more than 7 percent said they are Hispanic and less than 3 percent African-American. That was not surprising, but one person claimed to be Klingon. Another 86 participants simply declined to state their ethnicity. The majority of the participants, more than 66 percent, indicated that they work for a private law firm, with more than 50 percent working solo or in a firm with up to 15 lawyers in a local office. More than 45 percent of the respondents indicated that they are involved in litigation, giving them a window onto the judiciary. In several cases, a relatively small number of participants chose to rate various judges, but the following judges were rated by at least 200 participants: District Judge Tim Sulak was among the highest-rated local jurists with more than 81 percent of respondents saying his overall performance was excellent. An additional 15 percent rated Sulak as acceptable. More than 64 percent of respondents rated District Judge Scott Jenkins’ overall performance as excellent, and another 26 percent rated his overall performance as acceptable. Likewise, 91 percent of respondents rated Judge Rhonda Hurley’s overall performance as excellent or acceptable. Overall, Judge Karin Crump was rated excellent by 67 percent of those responding and acceptable by about 26 percent. Of those responding to the survey, 41 percent rated Judge Gisela Triana’s overall performance as excellent, and another 40 percent rated her performance as acceptable. You can read the results for all those rated here.
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?