About the Author
Elizabeth Pagano is the editor of the Austin Monitor.
-
Newsletter Signup
Most Popular Stories
- ‘Little Luckenbach’ could link Sam’s Town Point to $270M South Austin entertainment district
- Bathhouse working group suggests city start process to rename Barton Springs
- Demography map shows 90,000 new housing units wasn’t enough for Austin’s growth
- City releases new telework standards for its employees
- Austin Energy says e-bike rebate program on track to double in size
-
Discover News By District
Acevedo found in violation of city code
Wednesday, January 28, 2015 by Elizabeth Pagano
Monday night, the city’s Ethics Review Commission found that Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo was in violation of city code when he failed to submit a 2012 personal finance report by the required deadline. Commissioners opted not to send on the matter to the city attorney for prosecution, but will let the office know about the outcome. The vote was unanimous, with Chair Austin Kaplan recused. The commission additionally voted to send out a letter of notification, which recognizes that the violation was unintentional. That motion also passed unanimously, with an additional direction to get written confirmation of filings in the future. The complaint against Acevedo was filed by former Austin police officer Jermaine Hopkins. During Monday’s hearing, Hopkins urged commissioners to impose the maximum punishment on Acevedo. Hopkins also said that the fact that Acevedo was not present but participating by phone suggested he wasn’t taking the process seriously. “I don’t know how many times we are going to allow him to keep rendering these public apologies and let him get away with it,” said Hopkins. “It’s to the point now where he feels like he is immune to any disciplinary action.” Hopkins was fired by Acevedo on Oct. 30 for failing to follow orders and other violations of department policy, according to the Austin Police Department. His dismissal is currently on appeal. Acevedo’s attorney, Keith Campbell, said his client would have been at the meeting but was on business in Washington, D.C., “for the good of the city.” Acevedo’s assistant Janet De La Rosa testified that she submitted the document, and when she couldn’t print the form, she called the Office of the City Clerk twice but never got through. Campbell said that it was interesting to note that Acevedo’s 2012 report was handwritten. The reason for that, he explained, was “he didn’t trust that rascal filing system.”
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?