Austin parks groups propose new uses for hotel tax funds

Several groups made their cases for funding last night at a meeting of the Visitors Impact Task Force. The board is charged with exploring new uses for hotel tax revenue before a decision by City Council. Board members heard from Kim McKnight with the Parks and Recreation Department.

“While the promotion of amenities paid for by Austin taxpayers are very much beneficial in attracting tourists, the funds from the hotel occupancy tax are rarely reinvested back into the parks system,” McKnight said.

She said this is the first fiscal year the parks department has gotten direct funding, about $1 million, from hotel tax revenue. The department has developed a spending plan for that money, which includes restoration of sites like the Oakwood Cemetery and the Elisabet Ney Museum.

“The funding that we received just this year alone will definitely help us preserve, enhance and maintain our resources for generations to come,” she said.

For Fiscal Year 2016-17, Austin’s hotel tax revenue is expected to surpass $90 million. Outside of official city departments, several local parks advocates are looking for funding for their proposed projects and preservation efforts.

The board heard from Joanna Wolaver, executive director of the Shoal Creek Conservancy.

“We have a rough estimate of about $100,000,000 in repairs and improvements that we have a backlog of in our parks, and so we’re bringing these to you to say, hey, we’ve got this great need, and we’re going to share what we think is an opportunity to fund them,” Wolaver said.

Wolaver’s group has singled out some sites for improvement, including the Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail around Lady Bird Lake, and she said all of these improvements could be completed alongside another ambitious project that is on the table – a proposed expansion of the Austin Convention Center.

But task force member Pam Thompson expressed some concerns about location.

“I’m just really looking for more equity over all the city limits, and I did not hear about any improvements that would be going to the east side,” Thompson said.

There are still questions about whether state law would permit all of the proposed uses. State and local regulations specifically require the funds to go toward efforts that support tourism, though historic preservation efforts fit the bill. For now, the task force is exploring potential uses. The group plans to give official recommendations to Council by April 1.

Photo by Jorge Sanhueza-Lyon/KUT News. This story was produced as part of the Austin Monitor’s reporting partnership with KUT.

The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.