Slow response to flood report frustrates some commissioners
Monday, December 5, 2016 by Joseph Caterine
The city does not have many options for supporting individuals who suffer loss or damages from flooding caused by a development upstream, based on an exchange at the Nov. 29 joint meeting of the Planning and the Zoning and Platting commissions.
After a presentation on the Land Use Review Process by the Development Services Department staff, led by Donna Galati, Planning Commissioner Betsy Greenberg asked what happens if the drainage reviewers clear a development that after the fact causes flooding in neighboring areas. “What is the city’s responsibility?” she asked.
“We rely a lot on the engineer that designed the project,” said Leslie Daniel, a water quality reviewer at Development Services. “But we do watch for it.”
Andrew Linseisen, the department’s managing engineer, said that the Watershed Protection Department investigates if residents complain about flooding from a development, but that the ultimate responsibility lies with the developer and its engineer.
Zoning and Platting Commissioner Ana Aguirre, who also served on the city’s Flood Mitigation Task Force, was frustrated that the department had not considered the recommendations in that group’s final report.
“In my opinion,” she told the Austin Monitor, “some city departments work in silos and don’t talk to each other. If you’re a victim of this kind of flooding, it seems like you have to get your own attorney and your own engineer to challenge the original engineer.”
Linseisen said at the meeting that he knows Aguirre was disappointed with Development Services’ response but reiterated that as a department, they must stick to city code, and that Watershed Protection would be responsible for implementing any of the changes recommended by the task force.
As Cate Malek recently reported, the city’s Environmental Commission has expressed similar concerns. It has proposed the creation of a Drainage Infrastructure and Flood Mitigation Committee “that would work to create a more sustained and long-term response to major floods.”
Though the idea has “strong support” at the city, the committee has not yet been approved by City Council.
Photo by Matt Roberts made available through a Creative Commons license.
The Austin Monitor’s work is made possible by donations from the community. Though our reporting covers donors from time to time, we are careful to keep business and editorial efforts separate while maintaining transparency. A complete list of donors is available here, and our code of ethics is explained here.
Join Your Friends and Neighbors
We're a nonprofit news organization, and we put our service to you above all else. That will never change. But public-service journalism requires community support from readers like you. Will you join your friends and neighbors to support our work and mission?