County ponders partnership with city on one-stop justice shop
With a pair of aging courthouses between them, Travis County and the city of Austin could find a solution to their problems through mutual cooperation.
That idea was part of the focus of a Thursday afternoon work session at Travis County Commissioners Court during which county staff discussed the notion of freeing up land in downtown Austin by consolidating city and county departments that have overlapping services.
Last year, some critics of the county’s failed $287 million Civil & Family Courts Complex bond proposal argued that a more efficient use of money and real estate would be to put the county’s new civil courthouse under the same roof as the eventual replacement for Austin’s aging Municipal Court.
On Tuesday, Travis County Strategic Resource Planning Manager Belinda Powell told the commissioners that her staff, as well as judges from both sides, had weighed that option before. “And we have reached the conclusion that we should be pursuing independent projects,” Powell said. “However, we don’t seem to have the analysis to support to the Commissioners Court, to City Council, and to the general public at large.”
To that end, Powell asked the court to consider tasking an independent analysis of the pros and cons of co-locating the courts in the same building.
Powell and Travis County Senior Planner Mark Gilbert also showed the court a color-coded map of all government-owned buildings in the central business district, from the federal level down to city facilities. Aside from the civil and municipal courts, Powell suggested that other governmental functions – such as Central Booking Unit, Austin Police Downtown Command, the city’s Community Court and the potential sobriety center – could be consolidated in one way or another.
Powell said that any discussions about moving forward on these ideas would be the first of many steps in a planning process that could take up to 18 months to bear any fruit.
“It will be something that really is in the planning stages,” she told the court. “But I think they are conversations that are well worth having. And I think they will give you more comfort in your notions of what real estate you should be letting go of or if you should be ground-leasing for development in some other way.”
Should the city and county end up partnering together to consolidate services, it would not be outside the realm of possibility that those services could be relocated outside of downtown. Ultimately, though, County Judge Sarah Eckhardt shot down any speculation that the county might decide, as some have suggested, to pull up stakes entirely and leave the urban core.
“We want to shrink our footprint, but we don’t want to shrink our presence,” she said. “I think it is important that the seat of government, whether it’s the city or county, does have a presence in the central business district along with the state.”
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.
Key Players & Topics In This Article
Austin Municipal Court: This city department is the judicial branch of the City of Austin. The courts adjudicate Class C misdemeanor cases and has four divisions: Judicary, Court Operations, Support Services, and the Downtown Austin Community Court.
City of Austin: Our town
Travis County Civil and Family Courthouse: The Civil and Family Courthouse is currently planned for a redesign with a bond proposal for a 14-story, 511,000-square-foot building with 28 courtrooms.
Travis County Commissioners Court: The legislative body for Travis County. It includes representatives from the four Travis County Precincts, as well as the County Judge. The County Judge serves as the chair of the Court.