Enter a search term below to search the Austin Monitor.
Wednesday, July 3, 2013 by Charlotte Moore
Public Integrity Unit staffers face layoffs unless someone picks up tab
Layoffs are likely for the 31 employees of
The Public Integrity Unit investigates state public corruption cases and high-dollar, white collar crime like insurance and tax fraud. It’s made up of lawyers, paralegals, legal secretaries, peace officers, accountants, a document analyst, a receptionist and administrative staff.
The impending layoffs stem from Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg’s widely-publicized drunk driving arrest in April. She pleaded guilty and served jail time. In what some critics claim was a blatant partisan move, Gov. Rick Perry then threatened to veto funding for the Public Integrity Unit unless Lehmberg resigned. She did not, and Perry followed through with his threat and vetoed the unit’s $7.5 million ($3.7 annual) appropriation. Perry stated he could not in good conscience, “support continued state funding for an office with statewide jurisdiction at a time when the person charged with the ultimate responsibility of that unit has lost the public’s confidence.”
In this case, the tab to pay the unit’s bills falls to
Currently, some 425 cases are pending with 205 of those being active investigations. About 70 percent of the cases involve offenses that allegedly happened in
“If we find a way to pay for it with
Lehmberg, who did appear before
“We were notified on Friday this was going to happen,” he said. “So I had a meeting with my staff and let them know so they could be prepared. It’s still disappointing.”
Since the governor’s veto, two Public Integrity Unit staffers have found other jobs and one is retiring.
All may not be completely lost as yet for the remaining employees. During the last Special Session, State Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-Houston) filed a House Concurrent Resolution which failed to make any gains. Turner filed the same sort of bill on Monday. If passed, it could potentially override the Governor’s veto.
Each of the commissioners spoke on the item. Pct. 4 Commissioner Margaret Gómez said one of her main concerns is the message
“If we don’t do something, I think we’re advertising to folks that they can violate the laws,” she said. “They can defraud somebody and there won’t be any kind of action and that no one cares. I don’t think that’s what we want to do. I think we still have a lot of room for communication, considerations and we need to do the right thing.”
Daugherty spoke at length about Lehmberg’s role in the situation.
“I knew this was going to happen to us – that this thing was going to get wrapped around our axle,” he said. “I’m sick of the fact that there are 31-plus people over there living on pins and needles. I’m sorry (about) what has happened with Ms. Lehmberg. (But) I think that the District Attorney needs to really look herself in the mirror and say, ‘Is this worth what I am putting the Commissioners Court, the people of this community – much less if you start talking about the people, that their jobs and their lives can get pretty upside down pretty quickly by not having a paying job.’ I do think that’s the first step of really getting any traction at all with the Legislature about looking at the Public Integrity Unit and its funding from this point forward.”
“The DA’s office is looking at this and trying to evaluate any and all options,” Biscoe said. “Some of the smoke will clear once the Legislature has done its work and leaves town. Then we’ll know exactly what we’re dealing with monetarily.”
Do you like this story?
There are so many important stories we don't get to write. As a nonprofit journalism source, every contributed dollar helps us provide you more coverage. Do your part by joining our subscribers in supporting our reporters' work.