About the Author
Mike Kanin is the Publisher of the Austin Monitor. As such, he doesn't report on much--aside from the workings of the Monitor--any more. In his previous life as a freelance journalist, Kanin has written for the Washington City Paper, the Washington Post's Express, the Boston Herald, Boston's Weekly Dig, the Austin Chronicle, and the Texas Observer.
Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Austin’s airport is getting a new concourse and 20 more gates but not until the 2030s
- New rules in the works for electric vehicle charging stations
- Judge rules city can’t use taxpayer money for South Central TIRZ
- Budget deficit looms over city this year and beyond
- Save Our Springs Alliance sues City Council over Open Meetings Act
-
Discover News By District
Perry fails to veto EMS district bill despite late plea by Leffingwell
Monday, June 17, 2013 by Michael Kanin
Austin Mayor Lee Leffingwell was concerned enough about a piece of
Perry did not put the bill on his veto list.
At issue is Senate Bill 1596, a measure that would change the way that the city interacts with the Emergency Service Districts that provide fire and EMS service to jurisdictions that fall outside
According to Leffingwell, the bill was “amended at the request of the Austin Firefighters Association, a labor union” to require the city “to immediately and automatically provide full equipping and staffing for emergency services, without contracting with other adjacent entities.” He also argues that it “requires the annexing city to provide the same level of services as the emergency services district.” To this, Leffingwell suggests there is no way to measure the level of service “in the district…before annexation.”
Leffingwell also cites two constitutional issues: The fact that the bill uses a closed population bracket, meaning that it applies only to Austin, and that – with a portion of the bill that would allow for both an ESD and city control – the measure could expose residents to the problem of double taxation.
That, Leffingwell argues, “will make cities reticent about annexing territory in their extra-territorial jurisdiction that is in an emergency services district.” Taken together, Leffingwell suggests that the bill would effectively “punish the city by restricting its ability to annex any territory.”
More remarkably, Leffingwell’s indictment of the firefighters association would go against a long political relationship that the Mayor has had with all of the city’s public safety unions.
“Our concern is that our risk is inversely proportionate to our tax base now,” Chief Ken Bailey told Council members at the time. “We realize that the city has to grow; we realize all of the issues that are associated with that. That’s not the issue. We’ve still got to provide a service to our community, and they need to have the same level of service they had before the (Grand Prix) race.” (See In Fact Daily, Nov. 9, 2012.)
Bailey suggested that Council members leave Emergency Services District 11 in place after it annexed the facility – a move that the Austin Firefighters Association suggested might be illegal. (See In Fact Daily Oct. 12, 2012.) The loss of the track costs ESD 11 a significant amount of tax revenue that is generated by the facility.
Bailey told In Fact Daily on Thursday that Senate Bill 1596 was designed to ensure that residents of the portions of ESD 11 that were left intact would not receive diminished service after the track’s annexation. “They need to provide the same level of service as before,” he said.
Bailey added that the measure would also prevent a city from annexing a portion of an ESD, and then requiring the ESD to continue providing service in the annexed portion of its service area through an automatic service contract, such as the one that is in place between
“The automatic service agreement (became) a tool for them to use us as a proxy,” Bailey said, noting that the city collects taxes at the facility, but then doesn’t pay for the emergency service infrastructure needed to service it.
Bailey also strongly disputed the contents of Leffingwell’s letter. “That letter is not an accurate representation of the effects of this bill,” he offered.
Sen. Judith Zaffirini (D-Laredo) carried the bill in the Senate. She told In Fact Daily via email that “a city’s power to annex territory is not addressed in SB 1596.” Instead, she argued that the bill “focuses on emergency services for life and death situations that require the very best equipment and training.
“Even as the Circuit of the
Zaffirini also commented on the nature of the relationship between city emergency services and those at the track. “Because of an automatic aid agreement in place between the City of
“Now that the City has annexed the race track, ESD 11 still provides those services under the automatic aid agreement while experiencing a loss of $1.5 million to $2 million in revenue annually. This revenue loss jeopardizes services not only for the racetrack, but also for all the
State Rep. Eddie Rodriguez (D-Austin) sponsored the house version of the legislation. “All too often, first responder services are taken for granted as our city grows. We can’t just assume firefighters and
The late nature of the letter from Leffingwell may illustrate that the legislation did not appear on the city’s legislative radar as it was winning approval. Zaffirini seems to confirm that notion.
“No representative of the City of
Leffingwell implies that the issue may find its way to court. “The proper place to resolve the dispute between the ESD and the city over who should pay for the unnecessary fire equipment is the courts, not the legislature,” he writes.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?