About the Author
Mike Kanin is the Publisher of the Austin Monitor. As such, he doesn't report on much--aside from the workings of the Monitor--any more. In his previous life as a freelance journalist, Kanin has written for the Washington City Paper, the Washington Post's Express, the Boston Herald, Boston's Weekly Dig, the Austin Chronicle, and the Texas Observer.
Most Popular Stories
- New forecast modeling puts Austin homeless population near 4,600
- Texas Legislature could derail Austin’s transit expansion
- Report: APD Training Academy curriculum review flawed, hampered by resistance to reform
- Austin Public Health offers $50 gift cards for COVID vaccinations and boosters
- Landmark Commission stalls demolition at former summer camp in Northwest Hills
Discover News By District
Council okays fee instead of water quality pond on Lake Hills lots
Wednesday, February 20, 2013 by Michael Kanin
Austin City Council members Thursday ended a 10-year fight about water quality in the Austin Lake Hills subdivision located near
The city’s Watershed Protection Department will use at least a portion of those funds to construct the pond. In return, city development officials will lift red tags that prohibited electric connections on each of the properties, preventing owners from proceeding with home construction.
Property owner Matt King brought the issue to Council. King owns one of the lots. Subdivision developer Tom Jones owns two others, but controls a total of four lots with two more owned by his corporation.
King told Council members that, when he bought the property roughly a year and a half ago, he was unaware of the holds placed on it. If true, that would also mean that King was generally unaware of the complicated situation he had entered.
The Jones’ subdivision never won approval from the city’s Planning Commission, and was thus technically never platted. A 2001 Council ordinance allowed it to continue without a plat, but also enforced watershed protection rules.
These included a mandate to construct a water quality facility. That never happened.
In 2005, city inspectors placed red tag holds on properties not yet fully constructed. Only the six lots before Council were subject to that action.
King asked Council members to assign fees to all of the 32 lots in the subdivision.
Before the final vote, Council Members Kathie Tovo and Laura Morrison tried for an amendment that would assign the entire fee to Jones, the developer. The other five members of the Council opposed the idea.
For Morrison, it was an issue of fairness. She suggested that even if Jones couldn’t afford to foot the bill, she and her colleagues should assign the balance to Jones. “I’m not talking about ability to pay, I’m talking about what’s a fair allocation,” she said.
Morrison tried an amendment that would have handed all fiscal responsibility for the water quality pond to Jones’ lots. Only Tovo agreed and the amendment failed.
As part of the discussion about Morrison’s amendment, Mayor Pro Tem Sheryl Cole wondered if King would receive any benefit from a water quality pond.
Mayor Lee Leffingwell said it was time to move on. “I think staff has worked very hard to achieve an equitable settlement,” he said. “It may not be equitable in everybody’s eyes, but it’s a settlement that works. It’s an opportunity to remedy a potentially – I won’t say dangerous – a potentially adverse environmental situation that’s been going on for 10 years.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?