Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- New federal cash paves way for East Austin’s ‘wishbone’ bridge over Lady Bird Lake
- Austin’s airport is getting a new concourse and 20 more gates but not until the 2030s
- Judge rules city can’t use taxpayer money for South Central TIRZ
- Democrats vs. Republicans: First election coming for Travis Central Appraisal District board
- Save Our Springs Alliance sues City Council over Open Meetings Act
-
Discover News By District
ZAP approves final plat for two sections of Bradshaw Crossing
Thursday, March 25, 2010 by Austin Monitor
The Zoning and Platting Commission approved the final plat for another two sections of Bradshaw Crossing in far
Bradshaw Crossing, which will ultimately encompass more than 670 lots over more than 220 acres, will roll out in 19 sections, engineer Ryan Mattox told ZAP last week. During discussion at the hearing over approval of two of the earliest sections, commissioners were focused on the proposed mass transit component of the project’s SMART housing incentive package.
That program is intended to reward developers that meet certain criteria to encourage mixed-use affordable housing projects. Commissioner Sandy Baldridge addressed the commission’s concern over lack of specificity in transit requirements.
“We have no real standard for mass transit,” Baldridge noted of the SMART housing specifics. “We have one little vague sentence, and no one really defines it.”
Commissioners wanted to be sure that transit would actually be incorporated into the final project. Planner Javier Delgado, who is in charge of the city’s SMART housing program, noted that it would be his assumption that incentives would be rolled back if transit were not incorporated into the project. That was an assumption, Delgado said, because no developer had ever failed to meet the requirement.
Delgado confirmed that Capital Metro was apprised of, if not directly involved in, the Bradshaw Crossing project. Bus service reaches to just about a mile outside the project.
Applications involving SMART housing are automatically forwarded to the transit agency. In the case of Bradshaw Crossing, the assumption is that bus service will be provided within the project, which Mattox noted would be based upon streets in the area being upgraded to city standards in order to meet Capital Metro service requirements.
Bradshaw Crossing is so large that it is expected to roll out over the next five years, according to market conditions. The lots approved last night were some of the earliest.
Mattox said the developer had been in talks with Capital Metro, and while SMART housing does not have specific requirements for transit – for instance, a developer is not responsible for the construction of bus stops – Bradshaw Crossing’s developer would provide more specifics as to where and how bus stops would function in the development.
Dick Perrone of the Onion Creek Homeowners Association also addressed ZAP, noting that the neighborhood’s concern was wastewater management in the area. Perrone noted that three creeks run through or near the property and a total of almost 1,300 lots had been approved for development in the area near the Onion Creek subdivision.
“We would ask you to place a moratorium on any additional plats until we get some kind of regional plan for storm water management in place,” Perrone said.
Jose Guerrero, who serves as the city’s consultant on storm water issues in the area, said the city was in discussions with the Army Corps of Engineers,
While the region was in negotiations to buy out certain lots in the larger Onion Creek watershed to minimize flooding issues, that option was neither recommended for, nor desired in, the area of the Bradshaw Crossing subdivision, Guerrero told ZAP commissioners.
The developers of Bradshaw Crossing had gone ahead and upgraded the low water crossing on
Questioned directly by commissioners, Guerrero noted that the city did not permit properties that were in danger of being in a flood zone and that the properties in question were not in any danger.
Commissioner Gregory Bourgeois, who was chairing the commission hearing in Betty Baker’s absence, closed the discussion by noting that neighbors now have a direct contact in the city for any future questions about flooding issues. The plat passed unanimously, 6-0, with Baker absent.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?