About the Author
Mike Kanin is the Publisher of the Austin Monitor. As such, he doesn't report on much--aside from the workings of the Monitor--any more. In his previous life as a freelance journalist, Kanin has written for the Washington City Paper, the Washington Post's Express, the Boston Herald, Boston's Weekly Dig, the Austin Chronicle, and the Texas Observer.
Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- New federal cash paves way for East Austin’s ‘wishbone’ bridge over Lady Bird Lake
- Austin’s airport is getting a new concourse and 20 more gates but not until the 2030s
- Judge rules city can’t use taxpayer money for South Central TIRZ
- Democrats vs. Republicans: First election coming for Travis Central Appraisal District board
- Save Our Springs Alliance sues City Council over Open Meetings Act
-
Discover News By District
Coalition urges support for Austin Energy generation plan
Thursday, February 18, 2010 by Michael Kanin
A broad coalition of local businesses, Austinites, and non-profit organizations has announced its support for Austin Energy’s Resource and Climate Protection Plan and the accompanying recommendations made by the Austin Generation Resource Planning Task Force. The group, which united under the moniker Clean Energy for
The coalition expects wide support for its issue from the Austin City Council. It also noted that Austin Mayor Lee Leffingwell anticipates a vote on the matter to come as early as March. Leffingwell has already scheduled a town hall meeting for Feb. 22.
The Resource and Climate Protection Plan is the result of a 2007 Austin City Council resolution that instructed city officials to develop a plan of action that would magnify
The speakers at Clean Energy for
Matthew Johnson, a clean energy advocate for the group Public Citizen, cited flexibility of the plan. “It’s important to recognize that this plan is a roadmap,” he said. “If one energy resource is more expensive than we thought it would be five to seven years from now, we’ll have the ability to change this thing. We wouldn’t have that opportunity if
Johnson also served on the task force.
Sunshine Mathon, the Design and Development director of Foundation Communities, addressed the energy efficiency component of the plan. “The Energy Plan and the task force recommendations represent a continued investment in the cheapest form of energy—conservation-based reductions,” he said.
Mathon sees the plan as well suited to serve the needs of the low-income housing community his organization represents. “Ideally those (reductions) then also target folks who actually benefit the most from (them),” he added.
Lou Snead, a member of the steering committee of the Interfaith Environmental Network of Austin, said that his organization was impressed with the plan. “They did a good job looking at all of the issues,” he said.
Still, the network had at least one concern with the plan. Though Snead said that he was “pleased to see that there were measures” inserted into the plan to “mitigate” it’s potential impact on low income families, he felt that there was more that could be done. He added that the two-year review component of the plan offered the city a regular opportunity to address how it could further “lessen that impact.”
Steve Taylor, the North American Government Affairs Manager for Applied Materials, represented the
“Electricity isn’t cheap and it’s not going to get cheap,” he said. “You need to keep your options open and manage it efficiently. This plan will do that.”
When prompted, Cyrus Reed of the Sierra Club shot down the efficacy of an alternative energy solution that might keep energy costs lower over the next decade. For that plan, Reed said that officials would have to ignore the Council’s request that 30 percent of the city’s electricity come from renewable sources.
“If we chose not to meet the 30 percent goal, but instead do something else like add only natural gas to meet our needs, it would be fairly flat in costs over the next 10 years,” said Reed. “But everyone anticipates that the price of natural gas and the price of coal is going to go up. And so you’re not investing in your future if you stick with our present generation course.”
After the coalition made public remarks, Colin Meehan of Environmental Defense Fund told In Fact Daily that Clean Energy for
He added that, though the plan is a compromise, his group is happy. “Are there things that I’d like to see more of? Maybe energy efficiency, maybe some more environmental stuff,” he said. “But in general I think it’s a really sound plan.”
In response to the press conference favoring the plan, the business coalition known as CCARE was emailing the Council to ask for greater affordability and projecting huge increases in electric bills for big businesses such as Samsung five years from now. Such customers have long-term contracts with Austin Energy that prevent base rate increases before 2015.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?