Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- Austin’s airport is getting a new concourse and 20 more gates but not until the 2030s
- New rules in the works for electric vehicle charging stations
- Judge rules city can’t use taxpayer money for South Central TIRZ
- Budget deficit looms over city this year and beyond
- Save Our Springs Alliance sues City Council over Open Meetings Act
-
Discover News By District
Planning Commission OKs VMU zoning for Burnet, Lamar corridors
Friday, August 14, 2009 by Kimberly Reeves
The vertical mixed-use zoning category was one championed by former Mayor Pro Tem Brewster McCracken and a choice that is not likely to see fruition in the near future. Already, about two-dozen neighborhoods have opted into VMU zoning, and yet the landscape in
At Tuesday night’s Planning Commission meeting, Planner Wendy Rhoades noted that
Commissioner Saundra Kirk praised the neighborhood’s progressive stance on VMU zoning, saying
“It’s a very natural fusion, in my mind,” Kirk said. “It’s very easy to support this on my own, and I appreciate the neighborhood for looking at how much land was actually involved, and how many tracts were involved, and looking carefully and seeing what would work and what wouldn’t work.”
Chair Dave Anderson, the most logical of city commissioners, also waxed poetic about Brentwood, using the “L” word for
“I don’t hesitate to say that I love this neighborhood,” said Anderson who, although friendly, is completely logical about almost every zoning case. “I’m deeply vested in it, and I think this helps make a lot of improvements.”
The vote in favor of the VMU map was 6-0, with three commissioners absent from the meeting. New commissioners at their first meeting included Danette Chimenti and Kathryne Tovo. The recommendation will be forwarded to Council for final approval.
After the meeting, Planner Wendy Rhoades said that’s not entirely unexpected. The choice to opt in by neighborhood was intended to by a long-term strategy, one expected to encourage more cohesive – and less piecemeal – development among major transportation corridors. Instead of one developer after another coming to the Council, this set a basic framework for all development, one intended primarily to discourage dense development within single-family neighborhoods.
In some ways, the VMU zoning has become something of a zoning category placeholder, Rhoades admitted. It was created to direct the unwanted pressure of commercial and multi-family development from single-family neighborhoods to major transit corridors. Then the economy, and development, slowed down. Now the city must wait for the inevitable uptick that likely will make the mass zoning category of VMU worthwhile along various corridors.
The
Because it is VMU zoning, however, little will come to the city for approval beyond the site plan if a current or future owner chooses to pursue VMU development. The intention of VMU is dense development with zoning of at least two categories. Neighborhoods with rail stops were slotted for consideration after other neighborhoods, given that the zoning for transit oriented development, or TODs, is considered separately from “regular” neighborhoods.
A number of neighborhoods still remain to be considered for VMU zoning. Those include Central East Austin, which was put off at tonight’s Planning Commission meeting to the end of August in anticipation of a position letter on VMU by
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?