Newsletter Signup
The Austin Monitor thanks its sponsors. Become one.
Most Popular Stories
- New federal cash paves way for East Austin’s ‘wishbone’ bridge over Lady Bird Lake
- Austin’s airport is getting a new concourse and 20 more gates but not until the 2030s
- Judge rules city can’t use taxpayer money for South Central TIRZ
- Democrats vs. Republicans: First election coming for Travis Central Appraisal District board
- Save Our Springs Alliance sues City Council over Open Meetings Act
-
Discover News By District
Council zones Conn tract commercial
Tuesday, March 3, 2009 by Austin Monitor
On first reading, Council agreed last week to zone for commercial use about 60 acres near the intersection of Interstate 35 and State Highway 45, although surrounding property owners were far from thrilled that the new zoning could bring industrial facilities.
This parcel of land is just southeast of
Staff recommended GR-MU-CO zoning, which would be intended for community commercial uses, like those currently on the northbound frontage road of Interstate 35. In December, the Zoning and Platting Commission agreed to the more intense CS-MU-CO, with exceptions for adult-oriented businesses, blood plasma centers and pawnshops.
Peter Cesaro of Graves, Dougherty, Hearon and Moody represented the landowner of the
Cesar argued that the land was in the city’s desired development zone and is near, but not on, environmentally sensitive land. It’s also outside the flood plan.
The land currently is in the Creedmoor-Maha water utility service area, although Cesaro said a service extension request has been filed with the city. According to the documents on the service extension and annexation request, the goal would be to provide water service for 960 apartments, 250,000 square feet of retail uses, and 8,000 square feet of restaurant uses.
Cesaro said the landowner was willing to accept a conditional overlay for a trip limit of 2,000 vehicles per day, far less than implied under the request for water service. If, and when, full development comes to the property, the property owner – or owners, if the tract is subdivided – would have to come back to ask for a more intense zoning category.
Surrounding landowners are concerned with the possibility of a limited warehouse and distribution site on a portion of the property. Carol Urban’s family owns 450 acres south of the property. “Over the years, our family has looked at many different ways of developing our property,” Urban said. “We were not thinking of the commercial-industrial type scenarios you might see closer to downtown. We were interested in keeping the bar high.”
Landowners also are concerned that the topography of the tract might make it difficult for larger trucks to enter and exit the property. The city has yet to do a traffic impact study on the property.
Local landowners preferred the staff recommendation. Cesaro, in his rebuttal, said the owner would comply with all design standards and setback requirements set out by the city. The owner also agreed to various limits on uses.
Council Member Sheryl Cole moved for approval of the ZAP recommendation. Council approved the zoning, on first reading, with a vote of 6-0. Mayor Will Wynn was absent from this portion of the meeting.
You're a community leader
And we’re honored you look to us for serious, in-depth news. You know a strong community needs local and dedicated watchdog reporting. We’re here for you and that won’t change. Now will you take the powerful next step and support our nonprofit news organization?